Key Takeaways
- AEO tools track how AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity cite your brand, turning AI visibility into a measurable channel.
- OutreachBloom ranks first for B2B teams that want monitoring plus execution handled together, and yes, we publish this list.
- Otterly.AI wins on budget at $29/month, AthenaHQ on engine coverage per dollar, and Profound on enterprise depth.
- Judge every tool on whether AI answers change in your favor, since dashboards alone lose budget conversations fast.
AEO tools track and improve how AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews represent your brand in generated answers. If the acronym is new to you, start with the definition of answer engine optimization. This guide ranks the 11 best AEO tools and services for B2B marketers in 2026. OutreachBloom holds the top spot for teams that want monitoring and execution handled by one provider.
Wait, you ranked your own company first? Yep, and I’ll own that upfront: OutreachBloom publishes this site, and I’m the CEO.
So I held every entry to the same five criteria and gave each one a real limitation, including ours. When a competitor fits you better, I’ll say so plainly.
One vocabulary note before we start. I call ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and their cousins “the robots,” because the robots now write the first answer your buyers see. Every tool on this list exists to win the robots over.
New to the category? Start with my primer on what AEO is, then come back here to pick your tool.
Key Insight
The AEO category raised over $300 million in venture funding between summer 2025 and spring 2026. Profound alone closed $155 million across four rounds during that window. According to Gartner, “traditional search volume is expected to drop 25 percent by 2026.” Ouch.
The 11 Best AEO Tools at a Glance
| # | Tool | Best for | Starting price |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OutreachBloom | B2B teams that want AEO plus outbound handled | Custom |
| 2 | Profound | Enterprise with internal execution capacity | $99/mo (ChatGPT only); $399/mo multi-engine |
| 3 | Peec AI | Mid-market B2B and agencies | €89/mo |
| 4 | AthenaHQ | Mid-market B2B with a content team | $295/mo |
| 5 | Otterly.AI | SMBs and solo founders | $29/mo |
| 6 | Scrunch AI | Enterprise multi-brand monitoring | $300/mo |
| 7 | HubSpot AEO | HubSpot users and one-time audits | Free Grader; $50/mo paid |
| 8 | Ahrefs Brand Radar | Existing Ahrefs users | $199/mo on Ahrefs |
| 9 | Semrush AI Toolkit | Existing Semrush users | $99/mo add-on |
| 10 | Writesonic GEO | Content teams wanting tracking plus creation | $199/mo |
| 11 | Conductor | Enterprise SEO teams | $250/mo |
Six AEO Terms You’ll See in This Guide
The AEO category runs on overlapping jargon, so let’s define the six terms this guide leans on. Skim these now and the tool entries will read faster.
AEO (Answer Engine Optimization)
AEO is the practice of structuring content so AI platforms like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity cite a brand when generating answers. It replaces ranking-first thinking with citation-first thinking.
GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)
GEO is functionally identical to AEO. The term emphasizes generative AI engines specifically, but both labels describe the same work.
Citation
A citation is a specific reference inside an AI answer, often a linked source. Citations differ from brand mentions, which can include unlinked references to a brand inside a response.
Share of Voice
Share of voice measures how often a brand appears in AI answers for a category, relative to competitors. It’s the closest AEO equivalent to a traditional SEO ranking position.
Prompt Tracking
Prompt tracking monitors a defined set of buyer-style questions and records how AI engines respond. It’s the data foundation of every AEO tool on this list.
AI Overview
An AI Overview is the AI-generated summary Google shows above traditional search results. It appears on 15 to 25 percent of queries and pulls from a different citation pool than the blue links below it. Large language models, the systems behind ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, feed these answers and cite sources selectively.
How I Ranked These AEO Tools
I scored each tool on five criteria: AI engine coverage, data accuracy, actionability, pricing transparency, and B2B fit. Coverage and accuracy carried the most weight. A tool that can’t see Claude or Perplexity gives an incomplete picture.
In our work with B2B clients, the platforms that earn long-term retention combine accurate monitoring with a clear path to action. Pure dashboards lose budget conversations within two quarters, because leadership always asks what changed. Pricing and feature details below were last checked in July 2026.
1. OutreachBloom: Best for B2B Teams That Want AEO and Outbound Handled Together
Quick take: OutreachBloom is a done-for-you AEO service for B2B companies that combines AI visibility work with cold email outreach. It’s the only entry on this list that handles strategy, content, citation building, and direct buyer outreach end to end.
OutreachBloom is a B2B growth agency that gets brands recommended by AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity. In plain terms, we get the robots to say your name. Our AEO service covers prompt research, on-site content strategy, off-site citation building, and visibility monitoring as a fully managed engagement.
What separates us from software-only AEO platforms is execution. Tools surface gaps; we close them. We pair AEO work with done-for-you cold email outreach, reaching buyers through AI recommendations and direct contact at once.
Key features:
- Fully managed AEO service covering audit, prompt research, content strategy, and citation building.
- Reddit marketing as a core component, since AI models increasingly cite Reddit threads in B2B answers.
- Optional pairing with done-for-you cold email outreach for direct pipeline alongside AI visibility.
- Ongoing visibility monitoring across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews.
- Senior-led account management with no in-house tool to learn or operate.
- Transparent reporting tied to citation growth, brand mentions, and category share of voice.
Pricing: Custom, scoped on a discovery call.
Who should choose OutreachBloom:
- B2B SaaS, agencies, and professional services firms that want AEO results without staffing an in-house team.
- Companies that want AI visibility and outbound pipeline from one provider, on one contract.
- Teams in competitive B2B categories where citation share directly shapes shortlists.
Limitations: We’re a managed service, so there’s no self-serve dashboard to poke at on day one. Teams that only want software with published per-seat pricing should pick a tool below.
2. Profound: Best for Enterprise Teams With Internal Execution Capacity
Quick take: Profound is the enterprise leader in the AEO category, with $155 million raised and SOC 2 Type II certification. It tracks 10+ AI engines and serves brands like MongoDB, Ramp, Figma, Docusign, and Zapier.
Profound offers end-to-end AEO infrastructure built for large marketing teams with dedicated analyst resources. The platform tracks brand mentions, citations, sentiment, and prompt volume across 10+ AI engines. Coverage spans ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and Grok, plus an Agents feature for content generation with human review.
Profound’s pricing structure favors enterprise buyers. According to independent reviews, the $99/month Starter covers ChatGPT only with 50 prompts. The $399/month Growth tier adds Perplexity and Google AI Overviews, while full multi-engine coverage sits behind custom Enterprise pricing.
Key features:
- 10+ AI engine coverage at the Enterprise tier, including Claude, Gemini, Grok, and Meta AI.
- Prompt Volumes panel showing real prompt frequency rather than synthetic queries.
- Agents feature for AI-ready content generation with human-in-the-loop review.
- SOC 2 Type II compliance, SSO/SAML, and dedicated Slack support on Enterprise plans.
- G2 Winter 2026 AEO Leader designation with 180+ verified reviews.
- Integrations with Vercel, AWS, Cloudflare, and Google Analytics.
Pricing: $99/month Starter (ChatGPT only); $399/month Growth; custom Enterprise for full coverage.
Who should choose Profound:
- Fortune 500 marketing teams with dedicated AI search analysts and six-figure AEO budgets.
- Regulated industries that need SOC 2 Type II certification and procurement-friendly contracts.
- Enterprise brands tracking AI visibility as a board-level reporting line.
Limitations: The most useful coverage sits behind sales-led Enterprise pricing, and onboarding runs 1 to 3 weeks. Smaller teams pay an upgrade tax to see beyond ChatGPT.
Profound vs OutreachBloom
Profound is a sales-led enterprise software platform, while OutreachBloom is a managed B2B agency. Profound delivers the deepest data in the category, but teams still need internal resources to act on its insights. OutreachBloom owns execution end to end, including content, citations, and optional cold email outreach.
For a deeper head-to-head, see our Profound vs Athena vs Otterly comparison.
| Attribute | Profound | OutreachBloom |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Software platform | Managed service |
| Starting price | $99/mo (ChatGPT only); $399/mo for multi-engine | Custom pricing |
| AI engines tracked | 10+ at Enterprise tier | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews |
| Content production | Self-serve via Agents | Done-for-you content and citations |
| Outbound channel | None | Cold email outreach paired in |
| Setup model | Sales-led, 1 to 3 week onboarding | Kickoff call plus campaign launch |
| Best fit | Enterprise with in-house execution | B2B teams that want AEO handled for them |
3. Peec AI: Best for Mid-Market B2B Teams and Agencies
Quick take: Peec AI is the fastest-growing AEO platform by revenue velocity. It has raised $29 million and serves 2,000+ marketing teams. It uses UI scraping rather than API queries, giving citation data grounded in what real users see.
Peec AI is a Berlin-based AI search analytics platform built for mid-market B2B SaaS and agencies. It tracks 9+ AI engines including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, Llama, and Grok. Peec also offers broad multi-language support.
According to independent benchmarks, Peec hit €650K ARR within four months of launch and closed a $21M Series A in November 2025. Pricing starts at €89/month for the Starter plan. That tier includes ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews from day one, undercutting Profound’s same-tier coverage.
Key features:
- 9+ AI engines tracked, including long-tail models like DeepSeek, Llama, and Grok.
- UI scraping methodology that captures what real users see instead of just API responses.
- Broad multi-language support across major markets.
- Unlimited users on every paid tier, useful for agency teams.
- Looker Studio connector on the Advanced plan for custom dashboards.
- Multi-country reporting designed for global B2B brands.
Pricing: €89/month Starter, with ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews included.
Who should choose Peec AI:
- Mid-market B2B SaaS companies with $5M to $30M ARR and an in-house content team.
- Agencies managing multiple clients that need unlimited seats and white-label reporting.
- Global brands operating in non-English markets that need multi-language tracking.
Limitations: Peec AI diagnoses AI visibility gaps but doesn’t write content or build citations. Teams without a content engine will still need to buy or staff the execution work.
Peec AI vs OutreachBloom
Peec AI is a self-serve analytics platform that diagnoses AI visibility gaps but doesn’t write content or build citations. OutreachBloom owns the full execution work, including content production, Reddit marketing, and citation outreach. Mid-market teams with a strong content engine choose Peec AI; teams needing execution choose OutreachBloom.
| Attribute | Peec AI | OutreachBloom |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Software platform | Managed service |
| Starting price | €89/mo Starter | Custom pricing |
| AI engines tracked | 9+ engines including DeepSeek and Grok | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews |
| Content production | Not included | Done-for-you content and citations |
| Outbound channel | None | Cold email outreach paired in |
| Language coverage | Broad language coverage | English-first B2B focus |
| Best fit | Mid-market with internal content team | B2B teams without in-house AEO staff |
4. AthenaHQ: Best for Broad Engine Coverage Without Enterprise Pricing
Quick take: AthenaHQ is a Y Combinator-backed AEO platform built by former Google Search and DeepMind engineers. It includes all 8+ AI engines at the $295/month Starter tier, with no upgrade tax for multi-engine coverage.
AthenaHQ tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, and Grok at every paid tier. Customers include SoFi, ZoomInfo, Wix, and Volkswagen. Native GA4 and GSC integrations connect AI visibility lifts to pipeline metrics.
The platform leans hard into ROI proof, with published case studies showing 10x citation growth and 50 percent demo increases. According to independent reviews, AthenaHQ’s Citation Engine automation is the key differentiator. The feature serves content-heavy sites that need URL-level citation tracking, beyond brand-level mentions.
Key features:
- All 8+ AI engines included at the $295/month Starter tier with no upgrade gating.
- Native GA4 and Google Search Console integrations for pipeline attribution.
- URL-level citation tracking that shows which specific pages AI engines cite.
- Citation Engine automation for content-heavy sites needing scale.
- Shopify integration for ecommerce attribution.
- Founder pedigree from Google Search and DeepMind.
Pricing: $295/month Starter with every engine included.
Who should choose AthenaHQ:
- B2B SaaS teams that want broad engine coverage without enterprise pricing.
- Content-heavy organizations that need URL-level citation data.
- Teams that want native GA4 attribution tying AI visibility to pipeline outcomes.
Limitations: AthenaHQ still requires an internal team to act on insights, run content sprints, and build citations across third-party sites. The data is only as useful as the hands available to work it.
AthenaHQ vs OutreachBloom
AthenaHQ is one of the strongest pure-play AEO platforms for mid-market B2B, with broad engine coverage and proven case studies. It still requires an internal team to act on insights, run content sprints, and build citations across third-party sites. OutreachBloom replaces that internal capacity entirely, handling AEO execution and adding cold email as a second pipeline channel.
| Attribute | AthenaHQ | OutreachBloom |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Software platform | Managed service |
| Starting price | $295/mo Starter | Custom pricing |
| AI engines tracked | 8+ at Starter | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews |
| Content production | Citation Engine automation, self-serve | Done-for-you content and citations |
| Outbound channel | None | Cold email outreach paired in |
| Attribution | Native GA4 and GSC integrations | Reporting tied to citations and pipeline |
| Best fit | Mid-market B2B with content team | B2B teams that want execution included |
5. Otterly.AI: Best for SMBs and Solo Founders on a Budget
Quick take: Otterly.AI is the most accessible serious AEO monitoring tool, starting at $29/month. It holds a 4.8/5 G2 rating and earned Gartner Cool Vendor recognition for AI search visibility.
Otterly.AI tracks ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot daily. Google AI Mode and Gemini are available as paid add-ons. The Lite plan at $29/month covers 15 prompts; the Standard plan at $189/month adds 100 prompts and a Looker Studio connector.
The platform stands out for SMBs and solo founders who want daily tracking without a sales conversation. Otterly’s Semrush integration is another differentiator, since it lets existing Semrush users add AI visibility data without managing a separate tool. The trade-off is depth: Otterly is monitoring-first and doesn’t generate content fixes.
Key features:
- Lowest entry price in the serious AEO category at $29/month.
- Daily tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Microsoft Copilot.
- Semrush integration for unified SEO and AEO reporting.
- GEO Audit feature with SWOT analysis for a strategic baseline.
- Looker Studio connector on the Standard plan for custom dashboards.
- 14-day free trial with no credit card required.
Pricing: $29/month Lite (15 prompts); $189/month Standard (100 prompts).
Who should choose Otterly.AI:
- Solo founders and small B2B teams that want daily tracking on a tight budget.
- Existing Semrush users who want AI visibility data inside their current workflow.
- Teams establishing an AEO baseline before committing to enterprise tooling.
Limitations: Otterly is monitoring-first and doesn’t generate content fixes, and its deepest engine coverage sits behind paid add-ons. It shows you the gap and leaves the closing to you.
Otterly.AI vs OutreachBloom
Otterly.AI is the strongest entry-level monitoring tool for small B2B teams comfortable acting on data themselves. It surfaces gaps and stops there, while OutreachBloom owns both diagnosis and execution. Small B2B teams that lack content bandwidth typically find a managed service more cost-effective than a tool plus separate content investment.
| Attribute | Otterly.AI | OutreachBloom |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Software platform | Managed service |
| Starting price | $29/mo Lite | Custom pricing |
| AI engines tracked | 4 core engines plus paid add-ons | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews |
| Content production | Not included | Done-for-you content and citations |
| Outbound channel | None | Cold email outreach paired in |
| Free trial | 14 days | Kickoff call |
| Best fit | SMBs and solo founders | B2B teams that want execution included |
6. Scrunch AI: Best for Enterprise Multi-Brand Monitoring
Quick take: Scrunch AI is a brand intelligence platform with $26 million in funding and clients like Lenovo, Dell, and SKIMS. Its differentiator is the Agent Experience Platform, which serves AI-ready content to AI agents at the CDN level.
Scrunch AI monitors brand presence across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Meta AI, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, and Gemini. The platform’s persona-based filtering and topic segmentation are unusually granular. Teams can compare how AI engines describe a brand across customer segments and journey stages.
Pricing starts at $300/month for the Starter plan, with 350 custom prompts and 1,000 industry prompts. Scrunch has completed a SOC 2 Type II audit and supports multi-brand, multi-domain enterprise deployments. The Agent Experience Platform, which serves structured content directly to LLM crawlers, is the most differentiated feature in the category.
Key features:
- Persona-based filtering and topic segmentation for granular AI visibility analysis.
- Agent Experience Platform delivering AI-ready content at the CDN level.
- SOC 2 Type II certification with role-based access controls.
- Multi-brand and multi-domain support for enterprise deployments.
- Hallucination detection on brand claims appearing in AI answers.
- Competitor replacement detection when AI engines swap recommendations.
Pricing: $300/month Starter with 350 custom prompts and 1,000 industry prompts.
Who should choose Scrunch AI:
- Enterprise brands with multiple product lines or regional brands needing granular segmentation.
- Teams concerned about hallucinations and inaccurate brand framing in AI answers.
- Organizations with CDN infrastructure ready to support agent-level content delivery.
Limitations: Scrunch is monitoring-first with no built-in content production, and its CDN-level features assume infrastructure many mid-market teams don’t have.
Scrunch AI vs OutreachBloom
Scrunch AI offers some of the most sophisticated monitoring features in the category. It’s strong for enterprise brands tracking sentiment shifts and competitor positioning, though it’s monitoring-first with no built-in content production. OutreachBloom handles the execution gap directly, producing content, building citations, and running outreach campaigns alongside AEO monitoring.
| Attribute | Scrunch AI | OutreachBloom |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Software platform | Managed service |
| Starting price | $300/mo Starter | Custom pricing |
| AI engines tracked | 7 engines including Meta AI | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews |
| Content production | Not included | Done-for-you content and citations |
| Outbound channel | None | Cold email outreach paired in |
| Segmentation depth | Persona, topic, journey stage | ICP-based campaign segmentation |
| Best fit | Enterprise multi-brand | B2B teams that want execution included |
7. HubSpot AEO: Best for HubSpot Users and One-Time Audits
Quick take: HubSpot AEO pairs a free AEO Grader with a $50/month monitoring product covering ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. It’s the most accessible paid AEO tool from a brand most B2B marketers already trust.
HubSpot’s AEO Grader evaluates a brand across five dimensions: sentiment, presence quality, brand recognition, share of voice, and market position. The free version produces a 0 to 100 composite score in a single run. The paid HubSpot AEO product moves teams from one-time snapshots into continuous week-over-week tracking at $50/month.
HubSpot’s advantage is brand trust and integration with the broader HubSpot ecosystem. The trade-off is engine coverage: HubSpot AEO tracks three engines, while platforms like AthenaHQ offer 8+ at a similar commitment. According to HubSpot’s product page, no HubSpot subscription is required to use the AEO product.
Key features:
- Free AEO Grader producing a composite 0 to 100 brand visibility score.
- Paid monitoring at $50/month, no HubSpot subscription required.
- Coverage across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini.
- Five-dimension scoring including sentiment, share of voice, and market position.
- Weekly tracking cadence with trend reporting.
- Integration path for existing HubSpot customers.
Pricing: Free AEO Grader; $50/month for the paid monitoring product.
Who should choose HubSpot AEO:
- HubSpot customers who want AI visibility tracking inside their existing martech stack.
- B2B teams running one-time audits before committing to a dedicated AEO platform.
- Small marketing teams that prioritize ease of use over engine coverage depth.
Limitations: Three tracked engines is thin coverage next to dedicated platforms. The product tells teams where they stand without helping them improve.
HubSpot AEO vs OutreachBloom
HubSpot AEO is a strong, low-cost monitoring entry point, especially for teams already running HubSpot for CRM. It tells teams where they stand and leaves the improving to them. OutreachBloom runs the full AEO program for B2B clients, from prompt research through content, citations, and optional cold email outreach.
| Attribute | HubSpot AEO | OutreachBloom |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Software platform | Managed service |
| Starting price | Free Grader; $50/mo paid product | Custom pricing |
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews |
| Content production | Not included | Done-for-you content and citations |
| Outbound channel | HubSpot Sales add-on, separate | Cold email outreach paired in |
| Free option | Yes, AEO Grader | Discovery call |
| Best fit | HubSpot users and one-time audits | B2B teams that want execution included |
8. Ahrefs Brand Radar: Best for Existing Ahrefs Users
Quick take: Ahrefs Brand Radar is an AEO add-on built into Ahrefs’ established SEO platform. It holds one of the largest prompt databases in the category, at 371 million-plus monthly prompts, per Ahrefs.
Brand Radar tracks brand visibility in ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity. Its unique strength is correlating AI citations with the backlink and content data Ahrefs already collects. The Industry Segmentation feature filters visibility separately by product line, useful for diversified brands.
The scale of Ahrefs’ prompt database stands alone in the category. But independent testing found sizable undercounting: one reviewer reported 3 ChatGPT mentions from Brand Radar versus 123 verified manually. For teams already on Ahrefs the bolt-on is convenient; otherwise, dedicated AEO platforms usually go deeper.
Key features:
- 371 million-plus monthly prompts, one of the largest prompt databases in the AEO category.
- Direct correlation between AI citations and Ahrefs’ backlink and content data.
- Industry Segmentation for filtering visibility by product line.
- Historical data going further back than most newer competitors.
- Unified workspace with existing Ahrefs SEO tooling.
- Keyword-based prompt tracking integrated with traditional rank tracking.
Pricing: $199/month on Ahrefs.
Who should choose Ahrefs Brand Radar:
- Existing Ahrefs customers who want AI visibility inside their current platform.
- B2B teams that want AI citation data correlated with backlink performance.
- Brands with multiple product lines that benefit from Industry Segmentation.
Limitations: Independent testing has flagged undercounting of AI mentions, and coverage stops at three engines. Buyers who aren’t on Ahrefs already get more depth from dedicated platforms.
Ahrefs Brand Radar vs OutreachBloom
Ahrefs Brand Radar is a strong SEO-adjacent monitoring tool for teams already paying for Ahrefs. It surfaces citation patterns and links them to backlink data, though it remains a dashboard. OutreachBloom owns the full execution stack, including content strategy, citation building on high-authority platforms, and Reddit marketing, plus optional cold email outreach.
| Attribute | Ahrefs Brand Radar | OutreachBloom |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Software add-on | Managed service |
| Starting price | $199/mo on Ahrefs | Custom pricing |
| AI engines tracked | 3 engines: ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews |
| Content production | Not included | Done-for-you content and citations |
| Outbound channel | None | Cold email outreach paired in |
| Prompt database | 371M+ monthly prompts | Custom prompts per client ICP |
| Best fit | Existing Ahrefs users | B2B teams that want execution included |
9. Semrush AI Toolkit: Best for Existing Semrush Users
Quick take: Semrush’s AI Visibility Toolkit launched in March 2025 as a $99/month add-on to its established SEO platform. It’s the most convenient AEO option for teams already running Semrush.
The Semrush AI Toolkit brings visibility tracking, competitive benchmarking, and sentiment analysis into Semrush’s existing ecosystem. Existing Semrush customers can add AI visibility tracking without onboarding a new vendor. The side-by-side view of traditional SEO and AI visibility metrics is unique to the platform.
The trade-off is depth. As a bolt-on rather than a purpose-built AEO platform, Semrush’s AI features run shallower than dedicated tools like Profound or Peec AI. For teams that aren’t on Semrush already, dedicated AEO platforms usually offer more capability per dollar.
Key features:
- $99/month add-on for existing Semrush customers.
- Side-by-side view of traditional SEO rankings and AI visibility data.
- Coverage across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, and additional engines.
- Prompt-level tracking integrated with Semrush Position Tracking.
- Sentiment analysis for AI-generated brand mentions.
- Grok monitoring at the mid-tier, useful for US consumer brands.
Pricing: $99/month as an add-on to a Semrush subscription.
Who should choose Semrush AI Toolkit:
- Existing Semrush customers wanting AI visibility without adding a vendor.
- Teams that prioritize integrated SEO and AEO reporting in one platform.
- Marketers who run Semrush Position Tracking and want AI prompt data alongside it.
Limitations: The toolkit is a bolt-on, so depth trails purpose-built AEO platforms. Buying Semrush just to get it rarely pencils out.
Semrush AI Toolkit vs OutreachBloom
Semrush AI Toolkit is a sensible bolt-on for Semrush users who want a unified SEO and AEO dashboard. It’s a measurement tool with limited depth compared to dedicated platforms. OutreachBloom runs AEO as a managed service, handling content, citations, Reddit marketing, and optional cold email outreach.
| Attribute | Semrush AI Toolkit | OutreachBloom |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Software add-on | Managed service |
| Starting price | $99/mo add-on | Custom pricing |
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, additional engines | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews |
| Content production | Not included | Done-for-you content and citations |
| Outbound channel | None | Cold email outreach paired in |
| SEO integration | Full Semrush ecosystem | Reports tied to citations and pipeline |
| Best fit | Existing Semrush users | B2B teams that want execution included |
10. Writesonic GEO: Best for Content Teams That Want Tracking and Creation Together
Quick take: Writesonic GEO combines AI visibility tracking with AI content creation in one workflow, starting at $199/month. It’s built for content teams that want monitoring and production in the same tool.
Writesonic GEO tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Claude. It pairs monitoring with an Action Center that surfaces content recommendations and outreach targets. The platform’s AI agent rewrites pages for AEO, adding product schema, FAQ markup, and structured answers AI engines pull from.
Writesonic also offers free AI Traffic Analytics, letting teams baseline AI referral traffic before paying for monitoring. The Action Center includes Reddit thread alerts and high-DR listicle citations. It surfaces third-party citation opportunities where competitors appear and the brand doesn’t.
Key features:
- Integrated monitoring plus content production in one workflow.
- Action Center surfacing content ideas, subreddits, and outreach targets.
- AI agent rewriting pages with schema markup and structured answers.
- Free AI Traffic Analytics for baseline measurement.
- AI bot crawl tracking with auto-fix for indexing issues.
- Reddit and third-party citation gap analysis.
Pricing: $199/month, with free AI Traffic Analytics available before you commit.
Who should choose Writesonic GEO:
- Content teams that want AEO monitoring and AI-powered content production in one tool.
- B2B teams comfortable with template-based AI content generation.
- Marketers who want bot crawl tracking alongside visibility metrics.
Limitations: The content output is template-based AI generation, so teams still need internal capacity to review, refine, and distribute it. Citation building on third-party platforms remains a separate workstream.
Writesonic GEO vs OutreachBloom
Writesonic GEO is one of the few AEO tools that connects monitoring with content output in the same platform. Teams still need internal capacity to review, refine, and distribute that content, and citation building on third-party platforms remains a separate workstream. OutreachBloom handles the full execution arc, including content strategy, citation building, and Reddit marketing, with optional cold email outreach.
| Attribute | Writesonic GEO | OutreachBloom |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Software platform | Managed service |
| Starting price | $199/mo | Custom pricing |
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, Claude | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews |
| Content production | AI agent, template-based | Done-for-you human-led content |
| Outbound channel | None | Cold email outreach paired in |
| Free tier | Free AI Traffic Analytics | Discovery call |
| Best fit | Content teams wanting tracking + creation | B2B teams that want execution included |
11. Conductor: Best for Enterprise SEO Teams Adding AI Visibility
Quick take: Conductor is an enterprise SEO platform that added AI Search Performance tracking to its existing toolset. It serves global brands like Citi, Sephora, and FedEx, with pricing starting at $250/month.
Conductor’s AI Search Performance product tracks brand visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and other major LLMs. Teams get both traditional SEO metrics and AI visibility data in one interface. Synthetic Prompt Generation uses website data to generate targeted, relevant prompts for monitoring.
The platform’s strength is the unified workflow from insight to action to impact. Conductor connects AI visibility data with content creation workflows, real-time site monitoring, and a Data API for custom reporting. For enterprises already running Conductor, adding AI visibility is a logical extension.
Key features:
- Unified workflow combining traditional SEO and AI visibility tracking.
- Synthetic Prompt Generation using website data for relevant prompt sets.
- Data API for pulling visibility data into custom dashboards.
- 2026 AEO/GEO Benchmarks Report positioning Conductor as a category thought leader.
- Real-time site monitoring tied to AI bot crawl activity.
- Content creation workflows directly tied to identified gaps.
Pricing: $250/month starting, with custom Enterprise plans above that.
Who should choose Conductor:
- Enterprise SEO teams already running Conductor that want AI visibility in the same platform.
- Organizations that need unified SEO and AEO reporting at the global brand level.
- Teams with the in-house resources to act on insights surfaced by enterprise tooling.
Limitations: Conductor is an enterprise SEO platform with AEO added on, and it demands sophisticated in-house teams to operate well. Teams without an existing Conductor contract have lighter paths into AEO.
Conductor vs OutreachBloom
Conductor is an enterprise SEO platform with AEO bolted on, best for organizations already using it for traditional search. It’s a sophisticated tool that requires sophisticated in-house teams to operate well. OutreachBloom runs AEO as a managed B2B service, handling strategy, content, citations, and optional cold email outreach.
| Attribute | Conductor | OutreachBloom |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Enterprise SEO platform | Managed service |
| Starting price | $250/mo, custom Enterprise | Custom pricing |
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, others | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews |
| Content production | Workflows, self-serve | Done-for-you content and citations |
| Outbound channel | None | Cold email outreach paired in |
| SEO integration | Full enterprise SEO platform | Citations and pipeline reporting |
| Best fit | Enterprise SEO teams | B2B teams that want execution included |
AEO Tools Comparison: All 11 Entities Side by Side
| Tool / Service | Type | Starting Price | AI Engines | Content Production | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OutreachBloom | Managed service | Custom | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, AI Overviews | Done-for-you | B2B teams that want AEO + outbound handled |
| Profound | Software platform | $99/mo (limited); $399/mo functional | 10+ at Enterprise | Agents, self-serve | Enterprise with internal execution capacity |
| Peec AI | Software platform | €89/mo | 9+ engines, 115+ languages | Not included | Mid-market B2B and agencies |
| AthenaHQ | Software platform | $295/mo | 8+ at Starter | Citation Engine | Mid-market B2B with content team |
| Otterly.AI | Software platform | $29/mo | 4 core engines, add-ons available | Not included | SMBs and solo founders |
| Scrunch AI | Software platform | $300/mo | 7 engines | Agent Experience Platform | Enterprise multi-brand monitoring |
| HubSpot AEO | Software platform | Free Grader; $50/mo paid | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini | Not included | HubSpot users and one-time audits |
| Ahrefs Brand Radar | Software add-on | $199/mo on Ahrefs | 3 engines | Not included | Existing Ahrefs users |
| Semrush AI Toolkit | Software add-on | $99/mo add-on | ChatGPT, AI Overviews, additional | Not included | Existing Semrush users |
| Writesonic GEO | Software platform | $199/mo | 4 engines | AI agent content | Content teams wanting tracking + creation |
| Conductor | Enterprise SEO platform | $250/mo | Major LLMs covered | Workflows, self-serve | Enterprise SEO teams |
AthenaHQ vs Profound vs HubSpot AEO vs Ahrefs Brand Radar vs Otterly.AI
These five come up together more than any other combination, so here they are side by side on the criteria that separate them. Pricing was verified in July 2026.
| Criterion | AthenaHQ | Profound | HubSpot AEO | Ahrefs Brand Radar | Otterly.AI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $295 per month | $99 per month, $399 multi-engine | Free grader, $50 per month paid | $199 per month on an Ahrefs plan | $29 per month |
| Product type | Standalone platform | Enterprise platform | Add-on to HubSpot | Add-on to Ahrefs | Standalone monitor |
| Engine coverage | Broad across major engines | Broadest, ChatGPT-only on entry tier | Narrower, tied to HubSpot data | Tied to the Ahrefs index | Core engines only |
| Sentiment analysis | Yes | Yes | Limited | Limited | Basic |
| Share of voice tracking | Yes | Yes | Yes within HubSpot reporting | Yes against tracked competitors | Yes |
| Standalone or bundled | Standalone | Standalone | Requires HubSpot | Requires Ahrefs | Standalone |
| Best fit | Mid-market wanting coverage without enterprise pricing | Enterprise with internal execution capacity | Teams already running HubSpot | Teams already paying for Ahrefs | Solo founders and SMBs |
Forced ranking, best to worst, for a mid-market B2B team
Rankings shift with your situation, so this one names its buyer. Assume a B2B company of 50 to 500 people, no dedicated AI visibility headcount, and a budget under $500 per month.
- AthenaHQ. Best balance of engine coverage and sentiment analysis without enterprise pricing. Wins for a team that needs one tool to answer where we appear and how we are described.
- Profound. Deepest platform of the five, and the right answer above roughly $400 per month. The $99 entry tier covers ChatGPT only, which is too narrow to act on.
- Otterly.AI. At $29 per month it’s the cheapest honest way to find out whether you have an AI visibility problem. Shallower analysis, but the price makes it the right first purchase.
- Ahrefs Brand Radar. Strong if you already pay for Ahrefs, weak as a reason to start. Its view is bounded by the Ahrefs index rather than the engines themselves.
- HubSpot AEO. Convenient inside HubSpot and useful for a one-time audit through the free grader. Weakest standalone monitoring of the five, and it makes no sense as a reason to buy HubSpot.
Two notes on that ranking. Otterly places third on capability but first on whether to buy anything at all. HubSpot AEO places last only because it’s judged here as a monitoring tool rather than as a HubSpot feature.
Which of these five is best for sentiment and brand mention tracking?
AthenaHQ and Profound are the only two of the five with sentiment analysis strong enough to act on. Both classify how engines describe your brand rather than only whether they mention it.
Ahrefs Brand Radar and HubSpot AEO detect mentions well but treat sentiment as a secondary signal. Otterly.AI reports basic sentiment, which is reasonable at $29 per month and thin for a brand managing a reputation problem.
Semrush AI Toolkit vs Scrunch AI vs Peec AI
These three come up together almost as often. Semrush AI Toolkit is a $99 per month add-on and only makes sense on an existing Semrush plan. Scrunch AI is $300 per month and built for enterprise multi-brand monitoring, so it’s overscoped for a single product.
Peec AI at roughly 89 euros per month is the strongest standalone of these three for a mid-market team or agency. It’s the one to shortlist against AthenaHQ.
How to Get Started with AEO: A 5-Step Checklist
Do I need to buy a tool on day one? Nope, run these five steps in order first. Each takes between one hour and one week and produces something usable across your marketing program.
- Run a free baseline audit. Use HubSpot’s AEO Grader or Otterly.AI’s free trial to capture your current brand presence in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. Save the report as a benchmark.
- Map 10 to 20 buyer prompts. Identify the questions your target buyers most likely ask AI tools when researching your category. These prompts become the foundation for content strategy and tool configuration.
- Ask the robots yourself. Run those prompts in ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, then record which competitors appear, how often, and how each brand gets described. My guide on how to audit your brand’s AI search visibility walks through this step in detail.
- Decide between tool and service. Teams with internal content capacity should pilot a monitoring tool like Otterly.AI or Peec AI. Teams without that capacity should evaluate a managed service like OutreachBloom.
- Set a 90-day review cadence. AEO results compound over months rather than weeks. Establish quarterly reviews of citation growth, share of voice, and pipeline contribution to keep budget conversations grounded in data.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best AEO tool for B2B marketers?
OutreachBloom is the best AEO option for B2B teams that want monitoring and execution handled by one provider. And yes, we publish this list. Teams that want self-serve software should look at AthenaHQ for broad engine coverage or Otterly.AI for budget monitoring at $29/month.
What are AEO tools?
AEO tools are software platforms that track how AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude represent a brand in generated answers. They monitor citation frequency, share of voice, sentiment, and competitor visibility, then surface recommendations to improve those signals. For deeper context, see how AEO compares to traditional SEO.
How are AEO tools different from SEO tools?
SEO tools measure rankings, clicks, and backlinks tied to Google’s traditional search results. AEO tools measure whether a brand gets cited inside AI-generated answers, whether or not anyone clicks through. Most B2B teams need both, and my AEO vs SEO breakdown explains why the channels reward different content patterns.
Do B2B marketers need both an AEO tool and an AEO agency?
Not always. Tools handle measurement and recommendations, while agencies handle strategy, content production, and citation building. B2B teams with an in-house content engine can run tools standalone; teams without that capacity often prefer a managed service.
Which AEO tool is best for small B2B teams?
Otterly.AI is the most accessible monitoring tool at $29/month for basic tracking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. HubSpot’s AEO Grader is free for one-time audits, and the paid HubSpot AEO product starts at $50/month for ongoing monitoring. Small teams that want execution included usually prefer a managed service.
How long until AEO efforts show results?
Most B2B teams see initial citation movement within 4 to 8 weeks of consistent content and citation work. Peec AI recommends waiting 60 to 90 days before drawing conclusions, since 40 to 60 percent of cited domains change monthly. For attribution guidance, see how to measure AI search traffic to a website.
Can AEO tools track Reddit and third-party citations?
Most AEO tools surface which third-party domains AI engines cite when discussing a brand or category, including Reddit, G2, and industry publications. Tools differ in how deeply they break that down. Profound, Peec AI, and Ahrefs Brand Radar provide URL-level citation data, while lower-tier monitoring tools usually stop at the domain level.
What’s the difference between AEO, GEO, and AI visibility?
Functionally, they describe the same practice. AEO stands for Answer Engine Optimization, GEO stands for Generative Engine Optimization, and AI visibility is the plain-English umbrella term. For real-world results, see 11 examples of brands winning at AI search.
Pick Your Tool, Then Do the Work
Every platform on this list can show you what the robots think of your brand today. The winners will be the teams that change that answer, month after month, with content the robots trust.
If you have the internal capacity, start with a monitoring tool and run the checklist above. If you’d rather have one team handle the monitoring, the content, the citations, and the outbound, book a discovery call with OutreachBloom.

Jayson is a long-time columnist for Forbes, Entrepreneur, BusinessInsider, Inc.com, and various other major media publications, where he has authored over 1,000 articles since 2012, covering technology, marketing, and entrepreneurship. He keynoted the 2013 MarketingProfs University, and won the “Entrepreneur Blogger of the Year” award in 2015 from the Oxford Center for Entrepreneurs. In 2010, he founded a marketing agency that appeared on the Inc. 5000 before selling it in January of 2019, and he is now the CEO of EmailAnalytics and OutreachBloom.




